Midazolam Sedation Is Not ALWAYS Safe - Forum Thread Page 3 Here's a copy of the post;
Versed Sneaked Into Hernia Operation
posted by Ross on 07 Dec 2012 at 9:20 amOn November 4, 2012, I had hernia surgery at a Prince William County ambulatory center. Neither the surgeon nor the anesthesiologist mentioned beforehand their intention to use Versed, nor did I ask for or need a sedative. They told me about the Versed only after administering it, and then only because I asked persistent questions about what they had done.
Within three hours of being released by the center, I started experiencing severe nausea. This led to vomiting and heaving, which aggregated he pain. By 8 pm that evening, my girlfriend, an RN, arrived back from out of town, took one look, and hustled me to the ER. It took over five hours for them to control the nausea and pain. Even after they released me, I had significant problems into the next day.
Over the next three days, I experienced periodic nausea combined with confusion, memory loss, and irritability. I wrote a lengthy protest to the hospital over their use of Versed. They have not yet chosen to respond. In general, I do not have allergic reactions to anything. Versed appears to be the exception. Making it worse, the center's anesthesiologist has insisted that it has no side-effects, which is simply a lie. And it had no legitimate medical role in the surgery. I've had surgery before without such things and have fared far better.
The deception practiced by the Prince William doctors in this case was reprehensible. They want trust yet turn around and make moves that seem medically subversive at best.
previous page | post followup | alert a moderator |
Here an excerpt which I particularly like.... "Over the next three days, I experienced periodic nausea combined with confusion, memory loss, and irritability. I wrote a lengthy protest to the hospital over their use of Versed. They have not yet chosen to respond. In general, I do not have allergic reactions to anything. Versed appears to be the exception. Making it worse, the center's anesthesiologist has insisted that it has no side-effects, which is simply a lie. And it had no legitimate medical role in the surgery. I've had surgery before without such things and have fared far better.
The deception practiced by the Prince William doctors in this case was reprehensible. They want trust yet turn around and make moves that seem medically subversive at best."
The above are the last two paragraphs in the piece. "...the center's anesthesiologist has insisted that it (Versed) has no side-effects, which is simply a lie." Of course it's a lie. These anesthetists know perfectly well that THEIR drug of choice (not the patients choice by any means) causes major problems for a large sub-set of patients. These side effects are very well documented, but are deliberately minimized or denied by medical workers because it makes their job easier and/or more fun. There is AMPLE PROOF of this.
"And it (Versed) had no legitimate medical role in the surgery." Absolutely, categorically, indubitably true. (The emphasis is mine.)
The very last paragraph sums it up PERFECTLY, don't you agree? "reprehensible" and "subversive" are words which are very descriptive of what the actions of the medical minions are.
No comments:
Post a Comment